Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1967No. Civ. 11361PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
A demurrer was sustained without leave to amend to plaintiff’s complaint against defendant. Ground of demurrer was that the complaint showed on its face that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The appeal is from the judgment following the court order mentioned. We will affirm the judgment.
The complaint alleged, in the part here material, that on August 22, 1963, in a divorce action in which defendant was the defendant-husband he had filed an affidavit. The affidavit alleged that his ex-wife, who by the interlocutory decree in the divorce action had been awarded child…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Belli v. Roberts Brothers FursCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Filice v. BoccardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Moore v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Campbell v. Jewish Committee for Personal ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barton v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Isidore Shulman, M.D. v. Dona L. Miskell, Philip F. Hudock, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Williams v. CoombsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- McCutcheon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.