Legal Opinion

National Recovery Systems v. Frebraro

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1981No. 104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in concluding that the underlying contract was illegal and unenforceable. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the lower court.

On November 9, 1979, appellant, National Recovery Systems, filed an amended complaint in assumpsit, which alleged the following. On four occasions between March 12, 1977 and May 16, 1977, Caesar’s Palace, a Las Vegas, Nevada, casino, made personal loans to appellee, James V. Frebraro in the aggregate amount of $12,500.00. In exchange for the loans, appellee executed several drafts totalling that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Freach v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Duquesne Slag Products Co. v. LenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Samuels v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Sayne v. WylieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Barbet v. EdelsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API