Hanson v. Roesch
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered March 28, 1918, in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action on promissory notes.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The state bank examiner, successor in interest of the German-American Mercantile Bank (defunct), in liquidating its affairs as required by law, prosecutes this action on three promissory notes aggregating $4,500 principal, with interest at eight per cent per annum, payable to the order of Mercantile Funding Company, a partnership. One note for $2,000, dated October 19, 1914, and payable on or before April 19, 1915, was signed, “Louis Roesch” and “Edward Roesch.” It was indorsed, “Interest paid to April 19, 1916, Mercantile Funding Co., by W. J. Bruggemann. ” The second note, for $1,000, dated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colvin v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Western Dry Goods Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Willey v. Crocker-Woolworth Nat. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Boe v. Hodgson Graham Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ralph v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- DeLonge v. Richfield Oil Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Flynn's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Glaser v. ConnellWashington Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.