Legal Opinion
Cox v. Eichler
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 25, 1990No. C-90-1589 MHPPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, trustees of an employee pension and profit sharing plan, bring this action against a brokerage firm and one of its account executives alleging breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.; violations of federal and state securities laws; breach of contract; violations of state corporations law; and common law negligence, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. All allegations are based upon defendants’ conduct in the management of benefit plan funds.
The parties are now…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hill v. MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Yamauchi v. CottermanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Coleman v. Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Newman v. Comprehensive Care Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1992
- Schiffli Embroidery Workers Pen. Fund v. Ryan BeckDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.