Legal Opinion

Hill v. Marston

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 15, 1994No. 93-6133PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for remand to state court, alleging a lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse, holding that the federal court had no jurisdiction to entertain this civil lawsuit brought under Aabama state securities law, even though the case may involve some interpretation of related federal securities law.

This case involves the sale of shares of stock issued by Cooper & Greiler Diversified Companies, Inc. Plaintiffs David Hill, Mail-on Kent, Jr., Ronald C. McCoy, Peggy S. McCoy, James A Sparacio, Glenda…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Vann K. Howard and Kathryn D. Howard v. Parisian, Inc., Etc. Parisian Employees Health Care Plan Hahn Shoe Company Protective Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Diaz v. SheppardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Cook v. Chrysler Credit Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  3. 1st National Reserve, L.C. v. VaughanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1996
  4. Transport Auditing, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1995
  5. Wynn Ex Rel. Alabama v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API