Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Frankford Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 2009No. 819 EDA 2006, 933 EDA 2006PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. and its agent Dr. Robert T. Smith, appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in this medical malpractice action. The verdict was entered in favor of the plaintiffs, Appellees Joan P. Whitaker and Barbara V. Leezer, in their capacity as guardians ad litem for Caroline Mona-ghan. The jury determined that Dr. Smith and Dr. Harold J. Gauthier, who had previously settled with Appellees, were equally responsible for causing the injuries at issue in this case, and it awarded $5,200,000 in damages. After careful review of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Northeast Fence & Iron Works, Inc. v. Murphy Quigley Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Dubose, R. v. Quinlan, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Daniel v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Missett v. Hub International Pennsylvania, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Brown v. TrinidadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API