Legal Opinion
Doe v. Poe
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1998PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The facts relevant to this appeal are set forth in an opinion in an earlier appeal to the Appellate Division (see, Doe v Poe, 189 AD2d 132), and in the Appellate Division’s memorandum decision in this appeal (244 AD2d 450).
Supreme Court’s refusal to unseal the record of the hearing it conducted in the earlier related proceeding was premised on the erroneous assumption that the record may contain privileged information. The Appellate Division correctly determined that the communications and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Doe v. PoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Doe v. PoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bib Construction Co. v. City of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Cain v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. O'NeilNassau County District Court · 2014
- In re ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. KairisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.