Legal Opinion
In re Conway
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 21, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The respondent was served with a petition containing one charge of professional misconduct. In his answer, the respondent admitted the factual allegations contained in the petition, but denied that any disciplinary sanction should be imposed on him. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained the charge. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report. The respondent cross-moves to vacate the order of interim suspension and for reinstatement to the practice of law.
The charge alleges that the respondent engaged in professional misconduct, as…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Doe v. PoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Doe v. PoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Doe v. PoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4Cited by4 opinions
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- The Long Island Savings Bank, Fsb, and the Long Island Savings Bank of Centereach Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Conway v. ASTORIA FINANCIAL CORP.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- Keane v. TomskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002