Legal Opinion

Windahl v. Hasselman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 11, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

— 1. The one controlling issue in the case, whether plaintiff was a good-faith holder, was a question of fact for the jury; and yet there are 19 assignments of error and 26 brief points, some of them with a number of subdivisions. There are 123 pages of argument for appellant, answered by 36 pages for appellee. There is elaborate argument of some of the assignments and points which are not now in the case. We think there is unnecessary elaboration. It makes it burdensome. To illustrate: On motion of plaintiff, the trial court withdrew fromAhe consideration of the jury five allegations of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. McLaughlin-Gormley-King Co. v. HauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Walter v. C. D. & M. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Jettre v. HealySupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. State v. VoelpelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Conover v. HasselmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. State v. WehdeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API