Legal Opinion
Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 30, 1986No. Court No. 81-9-01305Published
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Carman, Judge:
Plaintiff challenges the United States Customs Service (Customs) classification of certain wood products invoiced as manmade veneers and marketed as Brookline veneers under item 207.00 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as articles of wood, not specially provided for.
The merchandise in question was manufactured in and exported from Italy to New York in 1979, 1980, and 1981. It consists of veneers sliced from a block of natural wood veneers which are dyed,1 glued, bonded, and cold pressed together. The formation and slicing of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Ameliotex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- United States v. Standard Surplus Sales, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Ameliotex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.