Ameliotex, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain Sarlane elastomeric fiber, invoiced as “Spandex Elastomeric Multi-Filament Yarns.”
The merchandise, imported from Belgium in 1970, was classified as a monofilament under item 309.03 or 309.06 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States [TSUS], as modified by T.D. 68-9, depending on the denier of the fiber (not presently at issue), and assessed with duty, respectively, at the rate of 35 or 24 percent ad valorem.
It is plaintiff’s contention that the imported yarn consists…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Haan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Ameliotex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- NEC America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Permagrain Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Oak Laminates Division of Oak Materials Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.