Legal Opinion

Lutz v. City of New Orleans

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 29, 1916No. 15456PublishedCited by 23 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Felix Lutz and others against the City of New Orleans. Application for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, District Judge.

This is a suit to enjoin the city of New Orleans from putting into operation certain provisions of Ordinance 2346 adopted by the commission council April 27, 1915, for the purpose of regulating what are popularly known as “jitneys,” the term being used to designate an automobile carrying passengers for five cent fares, very much the same as the ancient omnibus.

The material facts, set out in the bill and either admitted by the answer or not rebutted, are these: Plaintiffs are each the owner of an automobile personally operated by him in the transportation of passengers…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. The Chinese Exclusion CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. City of San Antonio v. FetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Frost v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Schafer v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API