Lyman v. Gaar, Scott & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From a judgment of tbe district court for Big Stone county in favor of plaintiff, entered-pursuant to the findings and order of C. L. Brown, J., defendant corporation appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action under the statute to determine adverse claims to real estate. The trial court found that the plaintiff was the owner in fee simple of the land described in the complaint, and that the defendant had no title to, interest in, or lien upon, it, and that judgment be so entered. The defendant appealed from the judgment.
The only claim asserted by the defendant to the land by its answer was that on January 10, 1895, it levied upon all the right, title and interest of Henry A. Buzzell in the land, by virtue of a writ of attachment issued in an action then pending wherein it was ■plaintiff and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parret v. ShaubhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Coles v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- School District No. 10 v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- McKenzie County v. CasadyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Scott v. Marquette National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Butterwick v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Kelly v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.