Legal Opinion

Thompson v. HOWARD BROS., INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 2008No. A07A1706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

Marvin Thompson filed a malicious prosecution action against Howard Brothers, Inc., alleging that it had improperly identified him as the perpetrator of the theft of a chainsaw from its hardware store. Howard Brothers moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. Thompson appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment order. Because Thompson has presented no evidence of malice or want of probable cause, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment ruling.

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Desmond v. Troncalli MitsubishiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Tate v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Crozer v. ReichertSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKissick v. S. O. A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Barnette v. Coastal Hematology & Oncology, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API