Legal Opinion

Tate v. Holloway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1998No. A97A2558PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Billy Ray Holloway sued Max Tate and V. M. Battle Company, Inc. (“Battle”) for malicious prosecution. Following trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Holloway. The defendants appealed, asserting that the trial court erred in denying their motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“j.n.o.v.”). We agree with the defendants and therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment.

In reviewing the trial court’s denial of the defendants’ motions for directed verdict and j.n.o.v., we must view the evidence presented at trial, with all reasonable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BlackfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Smith v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Truck Parts & Service, Inc. v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Courson's 441 South Station, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Camp v. EMSA LTD.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Pombert v. Glock, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Thompson v. HOWARD BROS., INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API