Legal Opinion

Erickson & Associates, Inc. v. McLerran

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1994No. 60623-4PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This appeal involves the application of Washington’s vested rights doctrine to master use permit applications. Petitioners, Erickson & Associates and Ron Danz (Erickson), challenge a City of Seattle ordinance that sets the vesting date for development projects. Under the city ordinance, Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) 23.76.026, a development project vests (1) when the developer submits a complete building permit application, or (2) when the City earlier issues a master use permit without a building permit application. Erickson contends the ordinance is unconstitutional, arguing Washington’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. West Main Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hull v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Valley View Industrial Park v. City of RedmondWashington Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API