Legal Opinion

A. Daigger & Co. v. Kraft

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 4, 1935No. Gen. No. 38,413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Cohhor

June 18, 1935, plaintiff filed its verified bill against defendants praying that they be enjoined from using trade lists, lists of customers, and other data and information which it was alleged that Maurice M. Kraft, one of the defendants, had surreptitiously abstracted from plaintiff’s files while he was employed by plaintiff. The bill further prayed that defendant Maurice M. Kraft be enjoined from prosecuting a suit which he had brought against plaintiff in the municipal court. The prayer was that a temporary injunction issue immediately and without notice and that after hearing it be made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago City Ry. Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  2. Chicago Exhibition Co. v. Illinois State Board of AgricultureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Streamwood Home Builders, Inc. v. BrolinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. Wagner v. OknerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Streamwood Home Builders, Inc. v. BrolinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API