Legal Opinion

Whiteley v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1998No. 23678PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

In this appeal, the State of Idaho seeks reversal of the district court’s order setting aside Michael Whiteley’s conviction and granting a new trial because of material facts not presented to the jury and in the interest of justice. Because we hold that the evidence presented by Whiteley in the post-conviction proceeding was insufficient to entitle him to relief on the grounds of newly discovered evidence, we reverse the order of the district court awarding a new trial.

The Court of Appeals affirmed Michael Whiteley’s 1991 judgment of conviction and sentences for first degree…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Woodward v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Mack Lloyd Snider v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. Ronald E. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API