Whiteley v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Justice.
In this appeal, the State of Idaho seeks reversal of the district court’s order setting aside Michael Whiteley’s conviction and granting a new trial because of material facts not presented to the jury and in the interest of justice. Because we hold that the evidence presented by Whiteley in the post-conviction proceeding was insufficient to entitle him to relief on the grounds of newly discovered evidence, we reverse the order of the district court awarding a new trial.
The Court of Appeals affirmed Michael Whiteley’s 1991 judgment of conviction and sentences for first degree…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ThomasIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Woodward v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mack Lloyd Snider v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Ronald E. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.