Legal Opinion
Aktiebolag v. ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 5, 2010No. 99 Civ. 8926, 99 Civ. 9887. No. M-21-81 (BSJ). MDL Docket No. 1291PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge.
On November 21, 2008, Plaintiffs Astra Aktiebolag, Aktiebolaget Hassle, KBI-E, Inc., KBI, Inc., and Astrazeneca LP KBI-E, INC., KBI, INC., and Astrazeneca LP (“Plaintiffs” or “Astra”) moved for leave to file a second supplemental complaint alleging additional facts relevant to assessing damages for infringement by Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Andrx”) under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2) and (e)(4). That same day, Andrx moved to amend and supplement its counterclaims (“Andrx’s counterclaim motion”). Andrx has also moved for an order that Astra’s claim of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Ruotolo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carfora v. Teachers Insurance Annuity Association of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Garcia v. FiguraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- In re: Elysium Health-Chromadex LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021