Legal Opinion

In re: Elysium Health-Chromadex Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 2021No. 1:17-cv-07394Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:_ 1/19/2021 IN RE ELYSIUM HEALTH-CHROMADEX LITIGATION : 17-cv-7394 (LJL) OPINION AND ORDER LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Defendant Elysium Health, Inc. (“Elysium” or “Defendant”) moves, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d), to amend its counterclaims. Dkt. No. 166. This is a false advertising and unfair competition case between the supplier of a dietary ingredient and its former wholesaler and now competitor. The dispute concerns an ingredient called nicotinamide…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring, and David WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Frances E. Weeks v. New York State (Division of Parole) & Patrick HoyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Biosafe-One, Inc. v. HawksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API