Legal Opinion
Alexander v. LOCAL 496, LABORERS'INT. UNION
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 25, 1987No. C84-3916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KRENZLER, District Judge.
This motion for summary judgment arises out of three consolidated cases, brought by several black plaintiffs against defendant Laborers’ International Union of North America, Local 496 (“Union”). The plaintiffs, in their complaint, allege that the Union has a policy of accepting new members which is in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“1981”). Following consolidation of the cases, the Union submitted this motion for summary judgment against six (6) of the plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corporation v. Storm King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Mary P. Valentino, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Margaret Christine REED, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carr v. Town of Dewey BeachDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Tomblin v. Local 496, Laborers' International UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Alexander v. Local 496, Laborers International UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1994