Legal Opinion

Tomblin v. Local 496, Laborers' International Union

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 26, 1998No. 1:94-cv-01705PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

O’MALLEY, District Judge.

For the reasons stated below, the Court rules as follows: (1) the Court’s Order dated February 28, 1996, is VACATED; and (2) defendant’s motions for summary judgment (docket nos. 28 & 45) ai'e both GRANTED, and this ease is DISMISSED.

I

This case returns to this Court on remand from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Earlier, defendant Local 496, Laborers’ International Union of North America (“Local 496”) filed a motion for summary judgment, which this Court granted. Plaintiffs Art Tomblin and Ronald Colvin appealed this Court’s Order, but the Sixth…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Cuyahoga Valley Career CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. A.W. Clark v. Shirley N. WeberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API