Legal Opinion

Balmer v. Balmer

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Motion to examine defendant husband as to present income prior to a hearing for an increase of support provisions provided, in final decree. The examinations for this purpose were allowed in Levine v. Levine (N. Y. L. J., Aug. 26,1957, p. 6, col. 6); Wade v. Wade (119 N. Y. S. 2d 599); Citron v. Citron (5 Misc 2d 1004) and Scheffer v. Scheffer (183 Misc. 344). Defendant has called the court’s attention to Greer v. Greer (147 N. Y. S. 2d 724) disallowing the examination. It will be noted that Justice Matthew M. Levy there assumed that there was authority for the examination but felt that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheffer v. SchefferNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Citron v. CitronNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Haber v. HaberNew York Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rann v. RannNew York City Family Court · 1967
  2. Bristol-Myers Co. v. Bargain Town U. S. A., No. 2 Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Union Folding Box Corp. v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API