Fletcher v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
*604OPINION
TAFT, Justice.
These appeals involve suits consolidated for trial against Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M), as manufacturer of silicon breast implants. The jury found 3M not liable. Appellants, Dorothy Fletcher, Susan Griffith, and Kerri Bonnette, claim the trial court impliedly directed a verdict against 3M and challenge that ruling. They also challenge the exclusion of one of their expert -witnesses. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
In the early 1980’s, appellants purchased 3M silicon breast implants through their physicians. Griffith’s implants were removed after…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Ludlow v. DeBerry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Salinas v. RafatiTexas Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re Estate of Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Bobbora v. Unitrin Insurance Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Lone Starr Multi-Theatres, Ltd. v. Max Interests, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- In re M.G.N.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- May v. Barton's Pump Service, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.