Legal Opinion

Frankfort Digital Services, Ltd. v. Neary (In Re Reynoso)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 20, 2004No. BAP No. NC-03-1262-BSP, Bankruptcy No. 02-41108-NT, Adversary No. 02-07197-ANPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION 1

BRANDT, Bankruptcy Judge.

Appellants Henry Ihejirika and Frankfort Digital Services sold licenses over the Internet for software which generated completed bankruptcy petitions, schedules, and statements of financial affairs from information users entered into dialog boxes on appellants’ websites. After trial on a complaint brought by the United States Trustee (“UST”), the bankruptcy court held that appellants were bankruptcy petition preparers (“BPPs”) within the definition of § 110(a)(1), 2 had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, and in fraudulent, unfair, or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Alary Corp. v. Sims (In Re Associated Vintage Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ferrette & Slater v. United States Trustee (In Re Garcia)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re HennermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  3. Geruschat v. Ernst & Young LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  5. Strickland v. U.S. Trustee (In Re Wojcik)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API