Legal Opinion

Boykin, Seddon & Co. v. Epstein

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Injunction and receiver. Practice. Before Judge Falligant. Chatham county. At chambers, November 12, 1890. Reported in the decisiou.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error presented to the judge of the superior court of Chatham county their petition praying for the appointment of a receiver of the firm of Epstein & "Wanubacher, and also for an injunction against them and a large number of their creditors. This petition was not sworn to, nor in any manner verified, when presented to the judge, who, without observing the same', granted a restraining order and rule nisi, and appointed a time for the hearing of the petition. At the hearing, petitioners announced themselves ready to prove the allegations of the petition by…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. PaschallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Bracewell v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Jacobs v. RittenbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Martin v. BurgwynSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Ex Parte American Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API