Legal Opinion
Kilgore v. Paschall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 10, 1947No. 15865PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under the act of 1899 (Ga. L. 1899, p. 73; Code, § 58-110), declaring a “blind tiger” a nuisance, the solicitor-general of the circuit in which such “blind tiger” is located may bring an equitable petition to abate the nuisance by injunction. Legg v. Anderson, 116 Ga. 405 (42 S. E. 720). The act of 1915 (Ga. L. Ex. Sess., p. 83; Code, § 58-T09), is broader in remedial provisions than the act of 1899 (Code, § 58-110). Pullen v. Meadors, 196 Ga. 801 (27 S. E. 2d, 655). In either instance the petition must proceed for the public on information…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Jennings v. SuggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Byrd v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Bracewell v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Legg v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Independent Bankers Ass'n of Georgia, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- BEA Systems, Inc. v. WebMethods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Agri-Cycle LLC v. CouchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.