Legal Opinion

Luster v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 7, 1932No. 4636PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, residents of Missouri, are executors of the estate of Erank C. Hermann, deceased. They appeal from an order appointing a receiver of an alleged trust fund, which constituted a part of the estate of the said Hermann, and which directs them to deliver to said receiver a sum equal to the trust fund and interest, namely $266,345.

The complaint in brief charged that: (1) In 1922, the Gillette Rubber Company, a Wisconsin corporation, became financially involved, and, on suit brought, Erank C. Hermann was appointed receiver and conducted its business as such receiver…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. JoySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Martin v. Wabash R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  5. Portland Gold Min. Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Saverio D. Iovino and Leonard P. Luisi v. George Waterson, Jr., Frances E. Carlin, as Administratrix of George Waterson, Sr., Deceased, SubstitutedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Commercial Solvents Corporation v. JassponDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  4. State ex rel. Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. RooneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Central Republic Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API