Legal Opinion

State v. Wiseman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 2011No. 200913913A; A143704PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant was charged with burglary, theft, and possession and distribution of a controlled substance. On defendant’s motion, the trial court issued a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized during the stop of a vehicle in which defendant was a passenger. Pursuant to ORS 138.060(l)(c), the state appeals, contending that the trial court erred in concluding that the police officer who stopped the vehicle lacked reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in criminal activity. ORS 131.615(1). We review for errors of law, ORS 138.220, and reverse.

We defer to the trial court’s findings of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. United States v. Maurillo Rojas-MillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. ClinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API