Legal Opinion

State v. Clink

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 29, 2015No. C121802CR; A153305PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine in violation of ORS 475.894. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence that a police officer discovered after defendant consented to a search of the parked vehicle in which he had been sitting. Specifically, defendant argues that, before he consented to the search, the officer had unlawfully seized him without reasonable suspicion in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. We conclude that the officer’s stop of defendant was justified by reasonable…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. MitcheleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. Eric K. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. State v. HallamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. McHaffieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API