Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Boardwalk Shopping Center, Inc. v. Court of Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1990No. 90-413PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

First, we grant Midwestern’s motion to intervene and overrule relators’ motion to strike. See Ohio Dept. of Adm. Serv., Office of Collective Bargaining v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1990), 54 Ohio St. 3d 48, 562 N.E. 2d 125. Second, since respondent’s motion presents evidence outside the pleadings, we treat it as a motion for summary judgment, which we hereby grant.

Relators’ action is in mandamus. They must therefore establish that they have a clear legal right to relief prayed for, that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the act requested, and that there is no plain and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Department of Administrative Services v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. City of Cleveland v. CalandraOhio Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State Ex Rel. Connole v. Cleveland Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Pan v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Mason v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bradford v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API