Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Nyquist
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1981No. Civ-1972-325PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, Chief Judge.
“We support integration as the priority education strategy; it is essential to the future of American 'society. In this [1967] summer’s disorders we have seen the consequences of racial isolation at all levels, and of attitudes toward race, on both sides, produced by three centuries of myth, ignorance, and bias. It is indispensable that opportunities for interaction between races be expanded.”
Report of the National Commission on Civil Disorders, at 25 (Bantam ed. 1968).
There has been much progress in race relations since this statement was written, particularly in Buffalo.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Columbus Board of Education v. PenickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arthur v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Arthur v. ManchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Arthur v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Arthur v. ManchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.