State v. Luttig
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Malone, J.:
The State appeals the district court’s determination of Wanda Luttig’s criminal history score following her conviction of two counts of forgeiy. Luttig had two prior forgeiy convictions. Based on Luttig’s third conviction of forgery, the district court or*1096dered her to serve 45 days in jail as a condition of probation. The issue is whether the district court used Luttig’s prior forgery convictions to enhance her applicable penalty in this case and, if so, to what extent. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.
On February 15, 2008, Luttig pled guilty to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Kansas v. McElroySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. GilleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- State v. LuttigCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- State v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.