Legal Opinion

State v. Pearce

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 23, 2015No. 110435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Under the Kansas sentencing guidelines, the more serious a defendant’s past offenses are, the greater tire presumptive sentence if the defendant commits a new felony offense. After Michael Pearce, Jr., was convicted of his fifth burglary, however, the district court did not include Pearce’s past residential burglary—a person felony—when calculating his criminal-history score because *117the court had used that conviction to apply a statute that makes prison the default sentence for recidivist burglars.

The State has appealed, contending that the district court erred by excluding the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. State v. ZabrinasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  4. In re E.F.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. LuttigCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. State v. LaPointeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API