Legal Opinion

Neal v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1940No. 27264Published

1Dissent 1

On Rehearing.

2Dissent · DavisonDavison, J.

On rehearing I find myself unable to concur in the conclusion of my associates. The question is of sufficient magnitude to warrant an expression of individual views.

The case involves a collateral attack upon the judgment of a court of general jurisdiction, holding valid a conveyance of restricted Indian lands. The judgment was rendered in 1931 by the district court of Pittsburg county. No appeal was taken and it became final.

We now in another and different action hold that that judgment was void because the court misapprehended the facts or erroneously applied the law to the…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Board of Com'rs v. PlattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API