Legal Opinion

Olson v. Cory

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1982No. Civ. 63644PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LA VINE, J. *

This is an appeal from a judgment granting plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and/or summary judgment and declaring that article III, section 4 of the California Constitution, as amended and adopted at the November 4, 1980, General Election, cannot constitutionally be applied to adjust the salary of active judges during their term of office, or adjust the retirement benefits of retired judges calculated on the basis of the salary of active judges.

The Facts

The undisputed facts are as follows: In 1980 the California Supreme Court held that statutory amendments…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Allen v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re Marriage of AlarconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Mehr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. McProud v. Siller (In Re CWS Enterprises, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API