Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1953No. 508PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendants’ first exception challenges the refusal of the court to grant their motion to suppress the evidence because it was obtained without a search warrant. The exception is untenable.

G.S. 18-6 provides, in so far as is material here: “. . . that nothing in this section shall he construed to authorize any officer to search any automobile or other vehicle or baggage of any person without a search warrant duly issued, except where the officer sees or has absolute personal knowledge that there is intoxicating liquor in such vehicle or baggage.” (Italics added.)

The uneontradicted evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . MeyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. HamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API