Legal Opinion

State v. Coffey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1961No. 2PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

Defendant made eleven assignments of error based on seventeen exceptions. Assignments 2, 5, 8, 10 and 11 are not brought forward in the brief and no reason or argument is stated or authority-cited in support thereof, and they are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 221 N.C. 563.

With respect to the occurrence of. 3 March 1961 when defendant was in the car driven by Boyd Sisk, defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that he was in possession of whiskey.

The evidence as to this incident is, in substance, as follows: In consequence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. McPeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API