Legal Opinion

Michel v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2001No. 34082PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case arose when petitioner, an attorney, deducted his fees from an arbitration award, placed the remaining funds in inter-pleader, naming his client and certain medical service providers holding liens to the award as defendants, and then sought to be discharged from the action. The district court refused the petitioner’s motion for discharge. Petitioner now seeks an extraordinary writ directing the district court to discharge him from the action. Although we decide that an attorney lien takes priority *147over a medical provider lien when an award is insufficient to pay all liens…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hanna Paint Manufacturing Company, D/B/A Hanna Paint Mfg. Co. Of Texas, as Intervener v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & RobbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Chattanooga Sewer Pipe Works v. DumlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In re Estate of CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Freddy Burton v. Infinity Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Freddy Burton v. Infinity Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Colvin v. M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  4. Freddy Burton v. Infinity Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Freddy Burton v. Infinity Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API