Legal Opinion
Stocker v. Stocker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1935No. 25951PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
To the wife’s petition for separate maintenance the husband filed an answer, and an unverified cross-petition for divorce. The wife assigns as error the denial of her petition for separate maintenance and the granting of a divorce to the husband; grounds, extreme cruelty.
Failure td verify the cross-petition was not objected to in the trial court and is not assigned as error in this appeal. The lack of verification is not jurisdictional and failure to verify has been waived. Javine v. Javine (1929) 134 Okla. 283, 273 P. 267.
The wife and husband were 54 and 56 years old, respectively. They were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tahona Smokeless Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Bruce v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Doggett v. DoggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Bussey v. BusseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manhart v. ManhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Layton v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Boles v. BolesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.