Legal Opinion
Imdieke v. Blenda-Life, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 19, 1985No. C1-84-1036PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
A jury returned a $114,000 verdict against appellant Blenda-Life, Inc. and in favor of respondent, Roger Imdieke, for loss of milk production and injury to dairy cows caused by a feed supplement manufactured and sold by Blenda-Life, Inc.
Blenda-Life, Inc. moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or a new trial. The trial court denied the motions, but reduced the amount of incidental damages from $10,000 to $5,000. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
Roger Imdieke, 30, has been involved in dairy farming all his life. In the fall of 1976 he was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Newmaster v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Benson v. RostadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hendricks v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Derosier v. Utility Systems of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.