Legal Opinion

Gay v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 30, 1924No. 15106PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where the general agency of a husband to purchase fertilizers for his wife has been established by previous dealings between him and a fertilizer dealer, the dealer has a right to assume, in the absence of notice to the contrary, that such agency continues to exist, and a sale of fertilizers by the dealer to the husband may, upon proof that the dealer, in dealing with the husband, intended to contract with the wife through the husband as agent, amount to a sale to the wife and not to the husband. Burch v. Americus Grocery Co., 125 Ga. 153 (53 S. E. 1008).

2. Although, when the sale was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burch v. Americus Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Interstate Financial Corp. v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Pacific Bone, Coal & Fertilizer Co. v. BleakmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Hogg v. Cole & HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Ma-Jet-Ic Furnace Corp. v. Great Southern Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Interstate Financial Corp. v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API