Legal Opinion

Hogg v. Cole & Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1925No. 16213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where in a suit upon an account the plaintiff proved that the goods were in the nature of supplies purchased in behalf of the defendant by his overseer for use upon the defendant’s farm, and that during the same year, and previously to the particular transaction, the’ overseer purchased from the plaintiff numerous bills of merchandise under similar circumstances, all of which the defendant paid, and that the overseer’s authority to purchase the supplies had never been questioned, a finding in favor of the plaintiff was authorized. Spencer v. Lovejoy, 96 Ga. 657 (1) (23 S. E. 836, 51 Am.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Germain Co. v. Bank of Camden CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Bacon v. Dannenberg Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Bender v. Hill Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Martin & Hicks v. Bridges & Jelks Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Armour Fertilizer Works v. AbelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API