United States v. Marchese

OPINION OF THE COURT

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Daniel G. Márchese challenges an order issued by the District Court on February 6, 2003, which amended his sentence with respect to the payment of restitution. Márchese contends that the District Court’s action in modify ing his sentence violates his right to be protected from double jeopardy. 1 Because the District Court acted in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3663(g) in amending the restitution order following Marchese’s failure to comply with the terms of the original order, we will affirm the District Court.

I

On May 12, 1995, Márchese was…