Legal Opinion
Edward E. Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1993No. 19-35017PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Our decision on the motion for rehearing was withheld pending the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Shalala v. Schaefer, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (June 24, 1993). In that case the Supreme Court held that the social security claimant should file for attorney’s fees after a judgment is entered remanding a case under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405. However, the Court went on to rule that the attorney’s fee application in that case was timely, because there had been no formal judgment entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The same is true in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Edward E. GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas FLORES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Walter Kadelski v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Virginia L. HOLT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Brown (Willadsen) v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
- Outlaw v. ChaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.