Legal Opinion

State v. Chamberlain

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1910No. Nos. 16,657—(26)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Defendant was arraigned in the municipal court of Mankato upon the charge of Sabbath breaking, to which he pleaded “not guilty.” The case was tried before Comstock, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of “guilty.” From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

A criminal complaint was made against appellant in the municipal court in the city of Mankato, charging him with the crime of Sabbath breaking, committed as follows: “That at the city of Mankato, Blue Earth county, Minnesota, on the 20th day of February, 1910, the same being the first day of the week, Sunday, D. W. Chamberlain did run and operate a public show for hire, and did admit the public thereto generally for an admission fee of ten cents each, against the peace and dignity of the state of Minnesota, and contrary to the statute in such ease made and provided.” It was shown by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HemlebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Eden Musee American Co. v. BinghamNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. William Fox Amusement Co. v. McClellanNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Holden v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Power v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. People v. DixonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Houck v. InglesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. State v. KernSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API