Legal Opinion
People v. Dixon
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1915No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Exceptions before sentence from Ionia; Davis, J. Charles Dixon was convicted of operating a moving picture theatre on Sunday in violation of statute.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Respondent stands convicted under the following information:
“Alfred R. Locke, prosecuting attorney in and for the county of Ionia aforesaid, for and in behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, comes into said court, in the November term thereof, in the year one thousand nine hundred and fourteen, and gives the court here to understand and be informed that one Charles Dixon and Guy Alexander together, with thirty and more persons whose names are to this complainant unknown, late of the city of Belding, in the county of Ionia, and State of Michigan, heretofore, to wit, on the 11th day of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scougale v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. HemlebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- State v. PennyMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Yerkes v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- William Fox Amusement Co. v. McClellanNew York Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People's Appliance, Inc. v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Watnick v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- People's Appliance, Inc. v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- People's Appliance, Inc. v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Watnick v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1962