Legal Opinion

Houck v. Ingles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1914No. Nos. 18,649—(180)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $159.54. The case was tried before Finehout, J., who when plaintiff rested granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, the owner of the advertising privileges on the curtains in two theaters in St. Paul, to recover for advertising space furnished the defendants under a written contract. At the close of the testimony the ease was dismissed on the *258motion of the defendants. The plaintiff appeals from the order . denying his motion for a new trial.

1. The two theaters conducted picture show and vaudeville entertainments daily including Sundays. The advertising contract between the plaintiff and the defendants contemplated that the space on the curtains would be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Handy v. St. Paul Globe Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Holden v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Power v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. State v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API