Legal Opinion

Bagley v. Washington Township Hospital District

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1966No. S. F. 21831PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

In the present case we consider once again the constitutionality of restraints imposed upon the political activities of a public employee. We once again review the factors which circumscribe the power of the government to exact as a condition of public employment a waiver of constitutional rights.

We have recently held that only a “compelling” public interest can justify the imposition of restraints upon the political activities of public employees and that, “It must appear that the restrictions . . . are not broader than are required to preserve the efficiency and integrity of the public…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API