Legal Opinion

Levi Strauss & Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 19, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-79. Court No. 93-11-00726PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUSGRAVE, Judge.

Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Company (“Levi”) brings this action to contest the denial of a protest by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) that sought duty allowances for U.S. origin cotton denim fabric components that were shipped to Guatemala for assembly and reentered into the U.S. Levi requested that the subject merchandise be allowed partial duty allowances under subheading 9802.00.80 of the HTSUS arguing that the cotton denim components were not advanced in value or improved in condition other than by the actual assembly or by minor operations incidental to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Goodman Manufacturing, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Mast Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Levi Strauss & Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Levi Strauss & Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Levi Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  4. Levi Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API